Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '17 at 10:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 73.9
2-Core 131
58% 95 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 460
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 44.6
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 31
Splatting 38.7
28% 33.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
483GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 94
Mixed 92.1
72% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.47
113% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 85%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 89.8
Mixed 88.4
68% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.53
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Adata DDR3 1600G Adata DDR3 1600G 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $601
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback