Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2430 0 115 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 143 58% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 434 44% 355 Pts	64-Core 508 32% 508 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 6000 1,288 User benchmarks, average bench 15% HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 573 MHz, MLim: 747 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	15% Very poor	Lighting 16.7 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 20.4 14% 22.5 fps	MRender 29.8 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 21.3 18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell PERC H710 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 907GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 188 189 184 181 179 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 64% Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler G3 8GB 2,703 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 1643 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 2.9 3.6 2.4 3 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	4.07% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.5 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 2.8 6% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.07% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B2G70BH0-YH9 4x16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 4 of 6 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-YK0 6x16GBUnknownBench 67%, 16 samples	5x
18KSF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 24GBUnknownBench 72%, 7 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 48GBUnknownBench 75%, 5 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $233