Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A315-23G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-23G  (all builds)
MotherboardDL Lotus_DA
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210218
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateAug 22 '21 at 17:59
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 37.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 142
45% 84.5 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 406
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1456) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.30.11
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 3.9
2% 6.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2P33F8BR2-256GB 256GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0214B0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 379 392 253 271 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 1,052
Write 758
Mixed 206
SusWrite 284
127% 575 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 9.6
73% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 316
207% 252 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 13.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.4
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO81EC
Typical Aspire A315-23G Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-23G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback