Asus N75SF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAsus N75SF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N75SF
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111201
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 08 '17 at 02:16
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 43.4
31% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 81.7
8-Core 206
16% 144 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Asus(1043 2051) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.86% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.38
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.78
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.86%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 90.8
Write 76.2
Mixed 90.9
65% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.06
31% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 61%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
271GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 99.5
Write 100
Mixed 96.6
74% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.2
73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 57%
Multiple Card Reader 64GB
26GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Read 17.6
Write 7.41
Mixed 1.61
9% 8.88 MB/s
4K Read 2.33
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73CB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N75SF Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N75SF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback