Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive27.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '21 at 16:09
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 169
2-Core 337
104% 196 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,242
113% 947 Pts
64-Core 2,308
143% 2,308 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.8% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 132
Parallax 80.5
77% 102 fps
MRender 94.7
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 97.6
80% 97.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 54 55 46 0.6 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 187
Write 39.4
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 43.1
18% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 11.9
57% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 19.2
DQ Mixed 18.2
14% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3200826AS 200GB
115GB free
Firmware: 3.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 65 62 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 64.5
Write 62.1
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 63.4
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 37%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85
97GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 72 65 99 103 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 101
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 88.9
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD4AGUA8A-26N1900 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 93.6
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 36.1
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 33.1
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 139%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 41: 4R 6G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
41% 27% 48 347 284 60 23.5" 1920 1080 ACR00B0 ACER V243HQ
Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback