Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY m6 Sleekbook

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 85% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP ENVY m6 Sleekbook  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1995
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20151008
Uptime165.3 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 03:52
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5745M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 27.5
2-Core 51.1
32% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 83.9
12% 89 Pts
64-Core 92.6
6% 92.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8610G
HP(103C 1995) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.104.7.0
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.7
2% 5.13 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.9
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$33
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 9.1 18 34 37 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 99.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 27.2
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.8
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY m6 Sleekbook Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY m6 Sleekbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback