Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 05:10
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.3% Average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 208
68% 124 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 317
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PwrHis(1787 3000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 32
19% 27.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 20.5
19% 24 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 273 372 411 369 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 414
Write 390
Mixed 279
SusWrite 346
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 32
114% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 282
231% 329 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 119%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
135GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 109
Write 124
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 77.5
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 77%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 500GB
350GB free, PID 5030
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 113 112 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
132% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX3200C16D4/8GX KHX2133C14D4/4G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 4R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 32% 47 103 6 60 23.5" 1360 768 XXX0000 AAA
History: Score 34: 4R 3G 5B | Score 43: 4R 6G 5B
Typical B450M Steel Legend Builds (Compare 8,416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Steel Legend - $97

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 126% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback