Today's hottest deals

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 14:55
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 170
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 611
57% 474 Pts
64-Core 1,609
100% 1,609 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 42.5
38% 45.5 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 43.1
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 87 176 157 136 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45% Average
Read 460
Write 406
Mixed 28
SusWrite 183
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.8
37% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 35.1
DQ Mixed 48.4
54% 97.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37.1
117% 41 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 3R 6G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
43% 30% 63 276 171 60 24" 1920 1080 ACI2494 VE248
History: Score 33: 3R 3G 9B | Score 43: 3R 6G 10B
Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback