Today's hottest deals

Microsoft Surface Pro X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro X  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro X
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210318
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Microsoft SQ1
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 89.4
39% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 202
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM256GDGTNG-87A0A 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80041C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 324 322 328 326 330 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNFBMALPR-NEE 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2096 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 30.1
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback