Today's hottest deals

Asus ZenBook UX363EA_UX363EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX363EA_UX363EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX363EA
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 08:36
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 162
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 312
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1362) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9686
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 8.7
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 438 520 594 759 673 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 41.7
Write 246
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 564
54% 233 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 24.5
70% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 319
215% 261 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 192%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E512M32D2NP-046 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 33
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 14.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX363EA_UX363EA Builds (Compare 685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX363EA_UX363EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback