Biostar A58ML2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A58ML2  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 11:35
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 119
62% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 193
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500
PwrHis(1787 2012) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1003
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 107 118 122 123 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 124
Write 116
Mixed 54
SusWrite 118
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 88%
ST640LM0 00 HM641JI 640GB
55GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 14.3
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 27.8
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PBA 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.5% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 14.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58ML2 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58ML2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback