MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 154%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C84
MotherboardMSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84)  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 80.5
1-Core 155
2-Core 308
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 620
8-Core 932
96% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$530
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 203
Parallax 201
187% 211 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 157
Splatting 126
139% 177 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 157%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
595GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1537 1331 1431 1374 1393 1343 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2742
Write 2,647
Mixed 1,923
SusWrite 1,401
488% 2,178 MB/s
4K Read 66.5
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 94.8
320% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,292
DQ Write 1103
DQ Mixed 1,193
895% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 348%
Great: 410%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
109GB free
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 86 86 86 77 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 379
Write 386
Mixed 354
SusWrite 114
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 90.3
4K Mixed 24.2
121% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 35.6
67% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
842GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 194 196 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 140
Write 110
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 193
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
304GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 151 152 152 151 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 153
Write 138
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 150
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 109%
Generic MassStorageClass 32GB
26GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 92.8
Write 52.2
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 51.8
82% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.6
295% 5.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 44.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 38.6
102% 35.8 GB/s
SC Read 31.4
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 40.2
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 3R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 20% 86 341 280 144 27" 2560 1440 ACR06E9 VG271U
History: Score 16: 0R 3G 7B | Score 35: 3R 3G 11B
Typical MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) Builds (Compare 7,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X570 TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7C84) - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,054
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback