Today's hottest deals

HP HPE-442f

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP HPE-442f  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime20.2 Days
Run DateAug 30 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 146
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 290
34% 265 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E111) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 8.1
9% 10.5 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 8
6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BiCS 120GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 169 140 47 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 250
Write 181
Mixed 202
SusWrite 128
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 13.6
71% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 73.8
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 26.3
47% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
466GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 119 123 119 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 120
Write 98.8
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 121
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 7 60 17" 1280 720 DEL4013 DELL 1707FP
Typical HPE-442f Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP HPE-442f

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $149
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback