Today's hottest deals

Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '21 at 11:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 46.5
1-Core 47.2
2-Core 129
41% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 206
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 8719) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.45.24
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 13.7
8% 11.1 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 9.7
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 122 15 104 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 454
Write 303
Mixed 190
SusWrite 81
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 5.7
18% 8.47 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 179
116% 132 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 216 216 217 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 151
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 210
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 113%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$30
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $615
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback