HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 887D
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210121
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 160
55% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 308
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 887D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8983
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.55% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 33% 9 61 42 60 11.6" 1366 768 AUO235C
History: Score 10: 1R 1G 2B | Score 5: 0R 1G 2B
Typical ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook x360 11 G7 Education Edition

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback