Asus PRIME Z270-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-K  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 02 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 49.7
2-Core 98.1
40% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 322
35% 278 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 20.3
0% 7.4 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 12.7
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
10GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 228
Write 258
Mixed 202
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 7.6
32% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 27.8
62% 127 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 31 38 31 35 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 75.6
Write 83.8
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 34.8
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
99GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 55 57 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 77.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 55.6
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57% Above average
MC Read 16
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 7.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 144 23.5" 1280 720 AOC2401 24G1WG4
Typical PRIME Z270-K Builds (Compare 2,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-K - $74

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback