Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 62.8 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 202 65% 119 Pts	4-Core 391 8-Core 373 52% 382 Pts	64-Core 397 25% 397 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.5% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 76.8 45% 63.5 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 58.7 Splatting 43.7 43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2G0A- 1TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 8.7 74 22 43 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 267 Write 346 Mixed 234 SusWrite 50.2 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 8 36% 12.9 MB/s	DQ Read 43 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 19.2 32% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 60%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 1,574 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 1TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 191 194 176 194 195 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 197 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 191 123% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 14,281 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.2% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 120 34% 120 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 23: 1R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
23%	33%	33	302	252	75	21.7"	1920 1080	GSM5B55 LG FULL HD

History: Score 43: 5R 3G 9B | Score 23: 1R 4G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	830x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	793x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	754x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	786x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	449x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	421x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	352x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $65Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	184x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	169x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	260x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	198x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $406

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353