Today's hottest deals

HP Rfrb HPE-570t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Rfrb HPE-570t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111013
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '21 at 19:36
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 167
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 452
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V3900 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 0106) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.53 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.4
5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 352 350 326 350 321 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 455
Write 382
Mixed 360
SusWrite 349
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 31.2
111% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 110
107% 179 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 150 144 151 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 51.6
Write 142
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 149
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
977GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 128 121 128 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 89.9
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 126
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4H1 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4H1 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 16
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA097 DELL P2214H
Typical Rfrb HPE-570t Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Rfrb HPE-570t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback