Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive556% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory64.3 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 06:47
Run Duration367 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 70.4
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
92% 175 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 969
94% 775 Pts
64-Core 2,142
132% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.11.01
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 123
Parallax 162
87% 130 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 112
Splatting 81.7
79% 98.2 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 5 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6010 5499 4049 4141 3286 3416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
556% Outstanding
Read 4,046
Write 7041
Mixed 3,314
SusWrite 4,400
1,065% 4,700 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 75.8
273% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 910
692% 925 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 556%
Great: 306%
Samsung 980 500GB
2GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,754
Write 3,688
Mixed 2,859
696% 3,100 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 76.5
250% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 591
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 865
595% 727 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 59%
Sabrent Rocket 4 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: RKT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3343 3327 2900 765 507 534 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Amd-raid Array 1 16TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 344 348 347 340 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 306
Write 391
Mixed 129
SusWrite 342
212% 292 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 2
653% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 187%
Great: 254%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 149 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 152
Write 157
Mixed 30
SusWrite 147
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
230% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 131%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 134 140 140 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 125
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 138
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.8
254% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 131%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$61
839GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 142 141 140 140 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 122
Write 101
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 139
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 96%
SDHC Card 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 11
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 12.2
21% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.4
164% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M4D3600C18 CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 79GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 32767, 8192, 32767 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 25.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 25" 1280 720 DELD06F DELL U2515H
Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,045
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $68
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback