Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 07:45
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31270
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 471
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 21.7
17% 20 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU750 256GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA001R29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 387 396 408 411 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 410
Mixed 373
SusWrite 388
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 34.4
114% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 280
218% 299 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 106%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
766GB free
Firmware: AX1R4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 106 98 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 97.3
Write 101
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 104
61% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 62%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB
0GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.3
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.3
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67G1600G 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0R 7G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 15% 54 169 94 60 26" 1920 1080 XXX0000 ONN TV
History: Score 13: 0R 4G 1B | Score 22: 0R 7G 1B
Typical XPS 8300 Builds (Compare 1,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 8300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback