Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel 0000 254 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 150 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 283 8-Core 397 43% 340 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 8621) 2GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 1649 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 19.6 Parallax 19.6 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 17.1 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 17.7 15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S3+ SSD 240GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0629AT SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 235 72 45 55 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 302 Write 302 Mixed 262 SusWrite 122 56% 247 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 39.9 117% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 206 168% 237 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 162%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 223GB free Firmware: KC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 80 86 80 84 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 118 Write 99.9 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 83.5 66% 90 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 10.5 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 12 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	27"	1280 720	AOC2701 27B1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	473x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	422x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	204x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1080Nvidia $245Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $733

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16