Asus P8H61/USB3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61/USB3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '17 at 18:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 86.3
2-Core 132
65% 104 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 221
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 30.2
21% 29 fps
MRender 30.6
Gravity 23.9
Splatting 34.5
25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
351GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 81.9
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.32
93% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 103
Mixed 42.3
60% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.31
80% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61/USB3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61/USB3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback