Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170113
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateSep 07 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 508
49% 405 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.2
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 64.7
52% 66.2 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 55.6
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 129 121 120 59 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 440
Write 312
Mixed 247
SusWrite 116
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 9.9
77% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 7.3
DQ Mixed 41.2
39% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 95%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
25GB free
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 252 232 226 237 208 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 405
Write 353
Mixed 360
SusWrite 252
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 29.4
112% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 323
241% 320 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 4 2 100 31.6" 1280 720 INN0032 ULTRON 3257
Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback