ECS A55F-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A55F-M3  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 07:09
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
P0, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Memory 66
1-Core 35.7
2-Core 49.9
36% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 76.5
8-Core 75.3
10% 75.9 Pts
64-Core 77.4
5% 77.4 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 848E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1002TSKB 1TB-$141
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MT4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 86 50 79 93 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 128
Write 141
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 88.5
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
49GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9 10 13 14 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.5% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 14.6
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 12.3
24% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix DMT451E6BFR8C-PB 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 48.5" 1280 720 SAM0A7A SAMSUNG
Typical A55F-M3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback