CMS 7200-5609A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCMS 7200-5609A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 16:50
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 175
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 239
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.9
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.5
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 50 49 89 23 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 103
Write 58.6
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 56.3
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 106%
HDD USB 3.0 320GB
194GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 48 48 47 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.9% Poor
Read 48.8
Write 43.2
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 48.4
30% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.C8FE CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FN 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 29.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 22.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 1R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 20% 15 25 5 60 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS2403 VA24D
Typical 7200-5609A Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: CMS 7200-5609A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback