Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1000M 3,569 User benchmarks, average bench 42% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 2.5 2-Core 38.2 25% 33.8 Pts	4-Core 47.7 8-Core 63 7% 55.3 Pts	64-Core 75.7 5% 75.7 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 064B) 2.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.28% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.3 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.28% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate STM9120817AS 120GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 26 21 21 7.7 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	7.24% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 19.3 Mixed 9.8 SusWrite 17.7 10% 13.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.24% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SH564128FH8NZPHSCR Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.8% Below average	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 13.5 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	159x
Celeron B830IntelBench 43%, 3,455 samples	47x
Celeron 1000MIntelBench 42%, 3,569 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	261x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	116x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	24x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 25%, 3,468 samples	26x
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	24x
ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 28%, 2,133 samples	22x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28