Today's hottest deals

Asus X450JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus X450JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450JF
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150504
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 00:35
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 194
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 508
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 11ED) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.24% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.1
3% 6.23 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.24%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTD256HAGL-00000 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 223 228 216 235 234 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 429
Write 238
Mixed 164
SusWrite 224
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 16
74% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 62.4
105% 209 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 79%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.5 9.5 8.2 8.1 9.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 16.5
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 9.3
21% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.8
151% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YKO 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 81 5 60 14" 1366 768 CMN1491
Typical X450JF Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback