Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 11:20
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 359
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 8354) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.83 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF100-19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 11 33 17 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 55.9
Write 58
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 25.3
33% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 42%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.5 9.4 9.4 8.8 8.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 19
Write 9
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 9.1
13% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99P5471-004.A01LF 99P5474-010.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 1% 78 13 9 60 21.9" 1366 768 SEE0032 29XS440
History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 3: 0R 1G 0B
Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback