Today's hottest deals

Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 138%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 17:52
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 160
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 509
49% 403 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 269
Reflection 271
Parallax 348
219% 296 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 250
Splatting 182
204% 260 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 191%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 304 274 229 229 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 457
Write 380
Mixed 263
SusWrite 264
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 18.2
73% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 114
102% 163 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$130
164GB free
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 281 280 265 278 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 419
Write 419
Mixed 282
SusWrite 284
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 25.9
90% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 333
DQ Write 46.1
DQ Mixed 101
97% 160 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
355GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 90 98 94 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 53.7
Write 109
Mixed 51.3
SusWrite 96.2
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
173% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 994008 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.9
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 40.1
121% 42.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 165 27" 1280 720 ACR0490 XB271HU
Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,755
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback