Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSamsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 03:43
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2675QM
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 154
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 348
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0B3) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.8% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.03 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.8%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 147 147 148 145 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 435
Write 382
Mixed 374
SusWrite 176
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 29.2
101% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 122
138% 233 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 110%
Sandisk iSSD P4 8GB
7GB free
Firmware: SSD 9.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 134
Write 24.2
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 25.8
12% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 5.6
23% 6.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-DJ-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19H 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 14.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 1 60 36.1" 796 516 HEC0000 65R6+
Typical 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3A/700Z4A/700Z5A/700Z5B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback