Biostar H61MLV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Biostar H61MLV (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '21 at 08:53
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 99.9 2-Core 196 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 378 50% 373 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.2% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 40.6 Parallax 38.1 30% 38.5 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 38.4 Splatting 27.1 28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB 15,164 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 141 136 126 137 133 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 217 Write 195 Mixed 165 SusWrite 134 132% 178 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 7.1 1,511% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 160%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB 17,638 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 291GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 129 128 129 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 123 Write 124 Mixed 63.9 SusWrite 127 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 765 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 9GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.8 10 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 7.2 Mixed 14.8 SusWrite 10.1 16% 13 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.6 183% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 M378B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.4% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 18.7 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 22: 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
22%	29%	34	110	6	60	18.5"	1366 768	SAM0867 SMS19A100

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61MLV Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	23x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	15x
Core i3-2120Intel $86Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	12x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	21x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	6x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 2,381 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380