Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 4,124 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Memory 82.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 153 72% 119 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 322 25% 225 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LENSE10256GMSP34MEAT2MA 256GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.3.2902 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 709 Write 860 Mixed 649 166% 740 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 57.8 192% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 770 DQ Write 540 DQ Mixed 545 437% 618 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 199%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB 8,604 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 387GB free Firmware: UC1700RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 262 25 3.2 144 4.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 351 Write 292 Mixed 250 SusWrite 128 57% 255 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 9.7 40% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 93 DQ Mixed 42.1 49% 85.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 04CB Samsung M474A1G43EB1-CRC 04CB 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.4% Very good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22.3 72% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 29.3 SC Mixed 23.3 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 71%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples	14x

GPU
Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples	10x
HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples	4x

SSD
LENSE10256GMSP34MEAT2MA 256GBBench 154%, 115 samples	5x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	3x
PLUS 480 GB 480GBSandiskBench 45%, 8,604 samples	2x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 264 samples	4x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 04CB Samsung M474A1G43EB1-CRC 04CB 48GBHynixBench 70%, 3 samples	2x
M474A1K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9905624-007.A00G 16GBSamsungBench 31%, 2 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16