Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TJ76

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemPackard EasyNote TJ76  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TJ76
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 20 '21 at 23:54
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User LCA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 430
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 63
2-Core 119
49% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 151
20% 153 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Acer(1025 033D) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 62 57 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40% Average
Read 80.8
Write 66.1
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 58.4
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40%
Great: 62%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
1GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.8 8.8 8.1 8.5 8.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 5.3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 8.5
11% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AD73I1C1674EV 802C 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 6GB
667, 533 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 28 24 15 60 15.5" 1366 768 SEC4141
Typical EasyNote TJ76 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TJ76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback