| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Compal QAL50 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Compal Type2 - Board Product Name1 |
| Memory | 8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130315 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 22 '21 at 01:26 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.4%
Above average
|
55% 89.6 Pts
|
32% 253 Pts
|
18% 294 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Compal(14C0 0066) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
1.23%
Terrible
|
0% 1.57 fps
|
3% 3.97 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 58 55 50 50 MB/s
|
31.9%
Below average
|
39% 53.7 MB/s
|
98% 0.77 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
50.6%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
36% 12.4 GB/s
|
48% 82.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical QAL50 Builds (Compare 27 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Compal QAL50
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 3x |
| Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 10x |
| HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 36% - Below average | Total price: $53 |