Asus PRIME A520M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 07:41
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Memory 72.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 772
81% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.20
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 26.5
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 22.3
Splatting 21.2
14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK512TDL 512GB
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5MU030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 433 415 414 414 360 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 459
Mixed 388
SusWrite 413
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 364
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SanMax SMD4-U8G46ME-32AA 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 95.3
42% 95.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 4R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 21% 61 117 86 60 24.1" 1920 1200 ENC2745 CS2420
Typical PRIME A520M-A Builds (Compare 340 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $106
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback