Today's hottest deals

HP 700-550na

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 700-550na  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150305
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 346
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 10.4
10% 12.6 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 134 134 134 134 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 436
Write 140
Mixed 154
SusWrite 134
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 58.1
4K Mixed 23.1
104% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 62.8
96% 189 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 79%
Sandisk SDSA6DM-016G-1006 16GB
15GB free
Firmware: U221006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 48 48 46 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 242
Write 46.6
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 47.4
21% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 8.9
40% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.3
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 12.5
11% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 28%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 186 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 145
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 187
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 HSD5173 HT231
Typical 700-550na Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP 700-550na

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback