Acer Aspire TC-220

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-220  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-220
Memory3.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
24% Poor
Memory 30.1
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 62.6
26% 44.3 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 106
14% 105 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Acer(1025 0904) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.5
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 5.9
Parallax 11.4
0% 5.83 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 6.2
5% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 47 50 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 83
Write 37.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 73
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/4G ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.6" 1280 720 SAM0E4A SAMSUNG
Typical Aspire TC-220 Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback