Huananzhi A_M_I_

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.82% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHuananzhi A_M_I_  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 19:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 181
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 706
62% 530 Pts
64-Core 1,190
74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.82% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 8.7
7% 11.3 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 0.6
7% 9.23 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.82%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB
86GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 117 55 80 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 445
Write 268
Mixed 265
SusWrite 104
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 18.8
73% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 42.5
47% 80.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 80 81 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 85.8
Write 93.7
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 79.5
60% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.9% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A_M_I_ Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Huananzhi A_M_I_

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback