Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Nitro N50-610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Nitro N50-610
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 20:05
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 246
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 796
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$218
Sapphire(174B A538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 89.5
Reflection 89
Parallax 84.6
73% 87.7 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 78.7
Splatting 72.2
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 147 136 143 120 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 1,106
Write 422
Mixed 429
SusWrite 140
115% 524 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 39.8
151% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 467
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 176
163% 260 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 206%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
320GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 85 85 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 85.4
120% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 52%
Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 6025
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 2.9
5% 4.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8ME-16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 11.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 56: 7R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 43% 46 299 217 60 21.5" 1920 1080 MSI3BA2 MSI MP221
History: Score 24: 2R 4G 2B | Score 56: 7R 4G 9B
Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback