Acer Aspire X1400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire X1400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1400
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 18:26
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Memory 47.6
1-Core 11.8
2-Core 23.4
21% 27.6 Pts
4-Core 46.8
8-Core 46.2
6% 46.5 Pts
64-Core 46.8
3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.93 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 90 71 46 90 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 93.9
Write 95.6
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 70.9
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
194% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U67F1600G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1400 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback