Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170608
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 254
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 792
78% 640 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 67.5
57% 70 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 66.4
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 1TB 1TB
246GB free
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 158 110 50 40 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 493
Write 407
Mixed 394
SusWrite 105
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 28.2
132% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 47.7
90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 104%
3 120GB SSD 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 375 376 262 42 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 371
Write 287
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 242
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 64.2
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0.2
54% 123 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 31.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 21.9
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR0728 KA222Q
Typical GA-X99M-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99M-Gaming 5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback