Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 09:08
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6700-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Memory 7.58
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 91.1
23% 48 Pts
4-Core 90.7
8-Core 86.1
12% 88.4 Pts
64-Core 84
5% 84 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0405) 783MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.9
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.6
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 108 107 52 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 78
Write 13.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 73.4
34% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate Basic 2TB
2TB free, PID aa14
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 18
Write 18.6
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 25.4
29% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4.8
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 427
9% 427 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback