Acer Veriton M200-A55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Veriton M200-A55  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer A58F2P-M2
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 14:42
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 115
48% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 158
8-Core 158
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.1
Parallax 4.3
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256gb EVM SSD 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 204 205 203 207 208 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 183
Write 142
Mixed 202
SusWrite 205
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 11.5
64% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 40
51% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
363GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 118 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 117
Write 117
Mixed 61
SusWrite 117
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO2L16BC2N1-BRHS Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 10
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 27% 22 36 5 60 18.5" 1366 768 DELD03A DELL E1914H
Typical Veriton M200-A55 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M200-A55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback