Today's hottest deals

Avita NS14A9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAvita NS14A9  (all builds)
MotherboardAVITA 6H14DR4M83
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210430
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateSep 27 '21 at 19:25
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 58.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 208
70% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 462
53% 415 Pts
64-Core 481
30% 481 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Device(1DC2 2215) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.8 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 14.6
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee S50AF512GB 512GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 385 354 348 328 331 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 386
Mixed 380
SusWrite 352
87% 384 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 40.3
142% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 238
180% 241 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron RS1G32LF4D2BDS-53BT 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical NS14A9 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Avita NS14A9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback