Today's hottest deals

ECS P4M890T-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 13%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive16.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS P4M890T-M  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 08:52
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 48.8
1-Core 20.1
2-Core 32.2
24% 33.7 Pts
4-Core 32.2
8-Core 32.4
4% 32.3 Pts
64-Core 31.9
2% 31.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 GS
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.2
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 34 36 44 52 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 76.6
Write 72.8
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 43
12% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 6.6
32% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 10.6
10% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 6.2 6.5 6.2 6.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.53% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.2
7% 4.77 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.53%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.15% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 2.1 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.4
4% 1.27 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.15%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P4M890T-M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS P4M890T-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback