HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 17:42
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6140
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 224
71% 132 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 505
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000
HP(103C 11B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1733 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 129
Parallax 120
105% 126 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 129
Splatting 112
95% 116 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 1012 943 893 856 824 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,695
Write 1,199
Mixed 580
SusWrite 929
245% 1,101 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 49.4
188% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 890
DQ Write 620
DQ Mixed 743
558% 751 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 216%
Great: 306%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
917GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 452 465 454 457 456 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 459
Mixed 422
SusWrite 449
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 138
163% 283 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%
Hgst GSPD3 4 Bay Base 24TB
13TB free
Firmware: 0600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 83 78 80 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
173GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 84 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 88.1
Write 79.4
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 83.3
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
222GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 120
Write 83.6
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 68.4
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 70%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
465GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 152 152 152 153 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 148
Mixed 104
SusWrite 152
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 8x8GB
8 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 65.7
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 54.9
152% 53.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.5
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 127%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0R 2G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 19% 58 343 278 60 25.8" 1920 1080 HWP3214 HP Z25n
History: Score 8: 1R 1G 0B | Score 15: 0R 2G 9B
Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $89Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $195Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback