MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 04:23
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 214
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 398
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
MSI(1462 7C52) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 16.2
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 22.3
13% 18.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 14
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 76 22 125 93 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 376
Write 296
Mixed 270
SusWrite 115
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 16.3
56% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 44.3
47% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
322GB free
Firmware: GG2OA7B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 91 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 76.4
Mixed 35
SusWrite 89.8
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53%
Great: 58%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 6.4 8 7.2 7.6 7.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 21
Write 1.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.4
10% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 DDR4 3000 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 34.5
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback