Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 124
2-Core 244
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 466
63% 470 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 161 164 163 132 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,020
Write 764
Mixed 595
SusWrite 176
194% 889 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 82.4
300% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 707
561% 784 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 221%
Great: 234%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
0GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 66 66 53 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 66.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 63.9
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
0GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 14 27 31 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 55%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
0GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 11 13 13 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
USB Disk 2.0 32GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 6.6 7.2 7.3 5.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 2.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 5.5
7% 7.22 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
24% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 3.9 5.6 5.4 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 9
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 6.6
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.4 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 3.4
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.6
152% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 64 0" 823 595
Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $415
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback