Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 99
2-Core 232
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 443
59% 435 Pts
64-Core 465
31% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 83%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 161 164 163 132 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,020
Write 764
Mixed 595
SusWrite 176
194% 889 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 82.4
300% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 885
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 707
561% 784 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 221%
Great: 329%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$37
0GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 66 66 53 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 65.9
Write 66.3
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 63.9
41% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$30
0GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 14 27 31 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 54%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$38
0GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 11 13 13 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 61%
USB Disk 2.0 32GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 6.6 7.2 7.3 5.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 2.5
Mixed 3
SusWrite 5.5
7% 7.22 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.5
24% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 3.9 5.6 5.4 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.43% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 9
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 6.6
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.43%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.4 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 6.5
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 3.4
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2.6
152% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 64 0" 823 595
Typical GA-H270-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $289Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-12400F $184Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i5-11600K $246Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $200
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $20Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $71G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $470SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback