Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 64.1 1-Core 60.6 2-Core 125 49% 83.2 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 155 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0466) 800MB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.56% Terrible	Lighting 0.6 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.9 0% 0.93 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.56% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 521A SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 78 85 82 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 118 Write 101 Mixed 106 SusWrite 83.5 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 43.3 4K Mixed 15.9 62% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 96.1 76% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Smart SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 2x4GB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.2% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 9.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.3 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	110x
Radeon HD 5400ATIBench 1%, 10,400 samples	43x
Quantic C3PhdgdBench 1%, 86 samples	6x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBAD80Bench 22%, 601 samples	24x
SH564568FH8NWPHSFG 2x2GBSmartBench 24%, 560 samples	10x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBAD80Bench 18%, 115 samples	7x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158