HP CQ3530IX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP CQ3530IX  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2A8C
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110321
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '21 at 09:31
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5800-$58
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 22.4
2-Core 26.2
31% 39.2 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 89.8
11% 85.6 Pts
64-Core 84.1
5% 84.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
HP(103C 2A8C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0319A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 177 184 161 141 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.6% Below average
Read 225
Write 204
Mixed 209
SusWrite 164
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 15.3
58% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 92.2
DQ Mixed 19.2
27% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
307GB free
Firmware: HP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 87 80 80 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 88.7
Write 84.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.2
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CQ3530IX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP CQ3530IX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback